System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Identifying barriers to decreasing meat consumption and increasing acceptance of meat substitutes among Swedish consumers
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy and Health, Material and Surface Design.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4730-6328
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy and Health, Agriculture and Food.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9394-0349
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy and Health, Agriculture and Food.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0408-3910
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy and Health, Agriculture and Food.ORCID iD: 0009-0009-8024-0031
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Appetite, ISSN 0195-6663, E-ISSN 1095-8304, Vol. 167, article id 105643Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A key lifestyle change people could make to reduce their environmental impact is to reduce their meat consumption. However, meat is still a staple in many people's diet, and some consumers are reluctant to cut down. Meat substitutes, if accepted as adequate replacements for meat, may offer a suitable alternative without leaving consumers feeling dissatisfied. The aim of the present study was to identify psychological barriers to reducing meat consumption and increasing use of meat substitutes among Swedish consumers. Participants engaged in focus group discussions around purchasing, preparing, and consuming meat and meat substitutes. Four main themes were identified through thematic analysis: uncertainty, scepticism, health, and identity. These are discussed in relation to previous work on the barriers to reducing meat consumption. Strategies to communicate the environmental impact of meat to consumers and effect change through behavioural interventions are considered. © 2021 The Authors

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Academic Press , 2021. Vol. 167, article id 105643
Keywords [en]
Behavioural change, Climate change, Consumer behaviour, Environment, Meat substitutes, adult, article, behavior change, consumer attitude, controlled study, environmental impact, human, meat consumption, meat substitute, purchasing, thematic analysis, uncertainty
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-56005DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105643Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85112235277OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-56005DiVA, id: diva2:1588231
Note

 Funding details: Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, 2018–01867; Funding text 1: This work was supported by FORMAS - Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning , grant number 2018–01867 .

Available from: 2021-08-26 Created: 2021-08-26 Last updated: 2024-09-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Collier, Elizabeth SOberrauter, Lisa-MariaNormann, AnneNorman, CeciliaNiimi, JunBergman, Penny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Collier, Elizabeth SOberrauter, Lisa-MariaNormann, AnneNorman, CeciliaNiimi, JunBergman, Penny
By organisation
Material and Surface DesignAgriculture and Food
In the same journal
Appetite
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 143 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf