Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comparative study on the nonlinear interaction between a focusing wave and cylinder using state-of-the-art solvers: Part A
Indian Institute of Technology Madras, India.
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Safety and Transport, Safety Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6934-634x
Ningbo University, China.
Number of Authors: 672021 (English)In: International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, ISSN 1053-5381, Vol. 31, no 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper presents ISOPE’s 2020 comparative study on the interaction between focused waves and a fixed cylinder. The paper discusses the qualitative and quantitative comparisons between 20 different numerical solvers from various universities across the world for a fixed cylinder. The moving cylinder cases are reported in a companion paper as part B (Agarwal, Saincher, et al., 2021). The numerical solvers presented in this paper are the recent state of the art in the field, mostly developed in-house by various academic institutes. The majority of the participants used hybrid modeling (i.e., a combination of potential flow and Navier–Stokes solvers). The qualitative comparisons based on the wave probe and pressure probe time histories and spectral components between laminar, turbulent, and potential flow solvers are presented in this paper. Furthermore, the quantitative error analyses based on the overall relative error in peak and phase shifts in the wave probe and pressure probe of all the 20 different solvers are reported. The quantitative errors with respect to different spectral component energy levels (i.e., in primary, sub-, and superharmonic regions) capturing capability are reported. Thus, the paper discusses the maximum, minimum, and median relative errors present in recent solvers as regards application to industrial problems rather than attempting to find the best solver. Furthermore, recommendations are drawn based on the analysis. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers , 2021. Vol. 31, no 1
Keywords [en]
Comparative study, Fixed cylinder, Hybrid modeling, Moving cylinder, Navier–Stokes, Potential flow, Validation, Errors, Probes, Academic institutes, Comparative studies, Industrial problem, Nonlinear interactions, Numerical solvers, Quantitative comparison, Quantitative error analysis, Spectral components, Cylinders (shapes)
National Category
Computational Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-53069DOI: 10.17736/ijope.2021.jc820Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85104701372OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-53069DiVA, id: diva2:1557103
Note

 Funding text 1: The first author thanks the Alexander Von Humboldt Foundations and German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), DST-UKIERI (DST-UKIERI-2016-17-0029 and DST/INT/UK/P-122/ 2016) for the experiments and numerical model developments of MLPG and qaleFOAM.

Available from: 2021-05-25 Created: 2021-05-25 Last updated: 2023-05-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Xu, G.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Xu, G.
By organisation
Safety Research
In the same journal
International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering
Computational Mathematics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 31 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf