Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A systematic mapping of current literature on sustainability at farm-level in beef and lamb meat production
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy and Health, Agriculture and Food.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0167-5603
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
2021 (English)In: Sustainability, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 13, no 5, article id 2488Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Beef and lamb meat production is associated with important cultural, economic and environmental impacts in most countries worldwide. However, it is also related with sustainability challenges. To enable cattle and sheep farming to develop in line with sustainability, existing knowledge need to be implemented and identified knowledge gaps filled. The purpose of this article was to systematically map the scientific literature on environmental, economic and social sustainability at farm-level beef and lamb meat production to identify knowledge gaps and to point to important future actions and areas of research. Papers published January 2000–August 2020 with a geographical origin in Europe, Northern America, and Australia-New Zealand were included. The systematic literature search resulted in a total of 1355 hits; however, after removing papers which were considered out of the scope of the study, and duplicate papers, only 22 and 11 papers related to beef and sheep farming, respectively were retained for further analysis. Of these, only 11 in total included all three sustainability dimensions. Several papers only mentioned one or two of the sustainability dimensions or put them in relation to that/those main dimension covered, thus limiting the extent to which possible synergies or tradeoffs between different sustainability aspects actually can be studied. This indicates a need for a more comprehensive approach when studying farm-level sustainability. Future research would benefit from a more holistic approach and include all dimensions of sustainability within the same study. Further, focus should also be on how to measure and assess sustainability aspects in a standardized way. © 2021 by the authors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG , 2021. Vol. 13, no 5, article id 2488
Keywords [en]
Animal welfare, Cattle, Life cycle assessment, Sheep, Sustainable production, environmental impact assessment, food production, holistic approach, knowledge based system, literature review, livestock farming, meat, sustainability, Australia, Europe, New Zealand
National Category
Animal and Dairy Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-52626DOI: 10.3390/su13052488Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85102417720OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-52626DiVA, id: diva2:1539785
Note

Funding details: Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, 2017-02017; Funding text 1: This research was funded by The Swedish Research Council Formas, grant number 2017-02017.

Available from: 2021-03-25 Created: 2021-03-25 Last updated: 2023-06-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sonesson, Ulf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sonesson, Ulf
By organisation
Agriculture and Food
In the same journal
Sustainability
Animal and Dairy Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 58 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf