Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A rapid review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews of environmental footprints of food commodities and diets
Stockholm University, Sweden; WorldFish Organization, Malaysia; Royal Swedish Academy of Science, Sweden.
Leiden University, Netherlands.
Leiden University, Netherlands.
Leiden University, Netherlands; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2021 (Engelska)Ingår i: Global Food Security, ISSN 2211-9124, Vol. 28, artikel-id 100508Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Systematic reviews, sometimes including meta-analyses, are often presented as an approach for identifying healthy and sustainable diets. Here we explore to which extent systematic review protocols have been adopted by studies comparing environmental impacts of foods based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) results, and to which extent they comply with the PRISMA protocol for transparent reporting. Out of 224 studies screened, seven explicitly define themselves as systematic reviews, and/or claim to carry out meta-analyses. Of these, only one acknowledges a review protocol, while none complies with all the PRISMA criteria. Neither do we believe that reviews of LCA results can comply with all the criteria or carry out meta-analyses, due to underreporting on standard deviations and artificial sample sizes in LCAs. Nonetheless, reviews of food commodities and diets based on LCA results would benefit from better aligning with criteria in systematic review protocols. 

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier B.V. , 2021. Vol. 28, artikel-id 100508
Nyckelord [en]
Diets, Footprint, Life cycle assessment, Meta-analysis, Systematic review
Nationell ämneskategori
Naturvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-52515DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100508Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85100887120OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-52515DiVA, id: diva2:1538258
Anmärkning

 Funding details: 00454; Funding details: Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, 2016–00227; Funding details: Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers, CGIAR; Funding text 1: This work was funded by FORMAS SeaWin project (2016–00227) and undertaken as part of the CGIAR Research Programs on Fish Agri-Food Systems (FISH) led by WorldFish and on Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security (CCAFS). These programs are supported by contributors to the CGIAR Trust Fund. PH was also co-funded by FORMAS Inequality and the Biosphere project (2020–00454).; Funding text 2: This work was funded by FORMAS SeaWin project (2016?00227) and undertaken as part of the CGIAR Research Programs on Fish Agri-Food Systems (FISH) led by WorldFish and on Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security (CCAFS). These programs are supported by contributors to the CGIAR Trust Fund. PH was also co-funded by FORMAS Inequality and the Biosphere project (2020?00454).

Tillgänglig från: 2021-03-18 Skapad: 2021-03-18 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-05-17Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Person

Ziegler, Friederike

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Ziegler, Friederike
Av organisationen
Jordbruk och livsmedel
Naturvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 78 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf