Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Principles and policies for recycling decisions and risk management
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Säkerhet och transport, Säkerhetsforskning.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-8548-657x
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Säkerhet och transport, Säkerhetsforskning.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1488-5650
2020 (Engelska)Ingår i: Recycling, E-ISSN 2313-4321, Vol. 5, nr 3, artikel-id 21Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Swedish recycling businesses argue that the Non-Toxic Environmental target gets too much weight and that resource efficiency gets too little focus, which results in decreased recycling. The purpose of this paper is to highlight different factors that recycling of waste decisions should consider, as well as contributing to a constructive discussion of the overall principles and policies for recycling. How recycling works in practice is explored based on nine interviews with stakeholders from the governmental agency level to recycling businesses. Theory with regards to ethics, risk, decision-making, governmental policy and laws is summarised. Finally, the discrepancy and connection between practice and theory is analysed. If recycling of waste is seen as a decision problem, the choice is between to recycle (in different ways) or not to recycle (i.e., energy recovery and/or landfill). Based on risk and decision theory, all relevant goals should be considered. This requires a broader problem framing when goals are in conflict. All parties agree that recycled and virgin material should be treated equally. From a higher policy perspective, it should then be demonstrated that any use of material (recycled and/or virgin) minimize environmental impact and promotes long-term sustainability. © 2020 by the authors.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
MDPI AG , 2020. Vol. 5, nr 3, artikel-id 21
Nyckelord [en]
Circular economy, Conflicting goals, Decision-making, Ethics, Recycling, Risk management
Nationell ämneskategori
Naturvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-49470DOI: 10.3390/recycling5030021Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85091625965OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-49470DiVA, id: diva2:1478107
Anmärkning

Funding text 1: Funding: This research was funded by RE:Source which is a Swedish innovation program financed by Vinnova, Formas and Energimyndigheten.

Tillgänglig från: 2020-10-21 Skapad: 2020-10-21 Senast uppdaterad: 2024-01-19Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Person

Gehandler, JonatanMillgård, Ulrika

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Gehandler, JonatanMillgård, Ulrika
Av organisationen
Säkerhetsforskning
I samma tidskrift
Recycling
Naturvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 67 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf