Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison between two strategies for the collection of wheat residue after mechanical harvesting: Performance and cost analysis
CREA Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Italy.
CREA Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Italy.
CREA Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Italy.
CREA Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Italy.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2020 (Engelska)Ingår i: Sustainability, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 12, nr 12, artikel-id 4936Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

The growing population worldwide will create the demand for higher cereal production, in order to meet the food need of both humans and animals in the future. Consequently, the quantity of crop by-products produced by cereal cropping will increase accordingly, providing a good opportunity for fostering the development of the sustainable supply chain of renewable solid fuels and natural feedstock for animal farming. The conventional machineries used in wheat harvesting do not guarantee the possibility to collect the chaff as additional residue to the straw. The present study investigated the possibility to equip a conventional combine with a specific device, already available on the market, in order to collect the chaff either separately (onto a trailer), or together with the straw (baled). The total residual biomass increased by 0.84 tha-1 and 0.80 tha-1 respectively, without negatively affecting the performance of the combine when the chaff was discharged on the swath. Farmers can benefit economically from the extra biomass collected, although a proper sizing of the machine chain is fundamental to avoid by-product losses and lower revenue. © 2020 by the authors.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
MDPI AG , 2020. Vol. 12, nr 12, artikel-id 4936
Nyckelord [en]
Bioenergy, Biomass, By-product, Chaff, Combine harvester, Straw, agricultural technology, byproduct, comparative study, cost analysis, crop residue, forage, harvesting, technological development, wheat, Animalia, Triticum aestivum
Nationell ämneskategori
Naturvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-45630DOI: 10.3390/SU12124936Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85087790887OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-45630DiVA, id: diva2:1458053
Anmärkning

Funding details: Horizon 2020, 727961; Funding text 1: This research was funded by European Union's Horizon 2020 AGROinLOG project grant number 727961 (http://agroinlog-h2020.eu/en/home/). Authors thank the contractor Leif Jönsson (Tjärby Gästgivaregård Laholm, Sweden) and his team for their valid support and assistance provided during the activities, as well as Sandu Lazar for their valuable contribution in the field activities. Moreover, the authors thank Consuelo Attolico for looking after the relationship with the French company ETS Thierart?.

Tillgänglig från: 2020-08-13 Skapad: 2020-08-13 Senast uppdaterad: 2022-02-10Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Person

Jonsson, Nils

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Jonsson, Nils
Av organisationen
Jordbruk och livsmedel
I samma tidskrift
Sustainability
Naturvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 64 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf