Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Basic In-Mouth Attribute Evaluation: A Comparison of Two Panels.
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Biovetenskap och material, Jordbruk och livsmedel. Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
2018 (Engelska)Ingår i: Foods (Basel, Switzerland), ISSN 2304-8158, Vol. 8, nr 1, artikel-id E3Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Astringency is often difficult to evaluate accurately in wine because of its complexity. This accuracy can improve through training sessions, but it can be time-consuming and expensive. A way to reduce these costs can be the use of wine experts, who are known to be reliable evaluators. Therefore, the aim of this work was to compare the sensory results and the panel performance obtained using trained panelists versus wine experts (winemakers). Judges evaluated twelve red wines for in-mouth basic perception (sweet, sour, bitter, astringent, and burning sensation) following the same tasting protocol and with the samples being presented in two different tasting modalities. Panels' performance and relationship between the chemical composition and the sensory perception were investigated. Both panels showed similar consistency and repeatability, and they were able to accurately measure the astringency of the wines. However, the significant correlations between sensory scores and chemical composition varied with the panel and the tasting modality. From our results, we could see that winemakers tended to discriminate better between the samples when the differences were very small.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2018. Vol. 8, nr 1, artikel-id E3
Nyckelord [en]
astringency, comparison, red wine, trained panel, winemakers
Nationell ämneskategori
Naturvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-37508DOI: 10.3390/foods8010003PubMedID: 30577639OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-37508DiVA, id: diva2:1281448
Tillgänglig från: 2019-01-22 Skapad: 2019-01-22 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-01-22Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed
Av organisationen
Jordbruk och livsmedel
Naturvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 3 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.35.8