Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sleepy Devices Versus Radio Duty Cycling: The Case of Lightweight M2M
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden (2017-2019), ICT, SICS. (Networked Embedded Systems)
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden (2017-2019), ICT, SICS. (Networked Embedded Systems)ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7257-4386
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden (2017-2019), ICT, SICS. (Networked Embedded Systems)ORCID-id: 0000-0003-3139-2564
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: IEEE Internet of Things Journal, ISSN 2327-4662, Vol. 6, nr 2, s. 2550-2562Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Standard protocols for wireless Internet of Things (IoT) communication must be energy-efficient in order to prolong the lifetimes of IoT devices. Two energy-saving strategies for wireless communication are prevalent within the IoT domain: 1) sleepy devices and 2) radio duty cycling. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation as to what types of application scenarios benefit the most from either type of energy-saving strategy. We select the lightweight machine to machine (LwM2M) protocol for this purpose because it operates atop the standard constrained application protocol, and has support for sleepy devices through its Queue Mode. We implement the Queue Mode at both the server side and client side, and design enhancements of Queue Mode to further improve the performance. In our experimental evaluation, we compare the performance and characteristics of Queue Mode with that of running LwM2M in a network stack with the standard time-slotted channel hopping as the duty cycling medium access control protocol. By analyzing the results with the support of an empirical model, we find that each energy-saving strategy has different advantages and disadvantages depending on the scenario and traffic pattern. Hence, we also produce guidelines that can help developers to select the appropriate energy-saving strategy based on the application scenario.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
IEEE, 2019. Vol. 6, nr 2, s. 2550-2562
Emneord [en]
802.15.4, Internet of Things, LwM2M, TSCH
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-39258DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2871721Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85054219063OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-39258DiVA, id: diva2:1332842
Forskningsfinansiär
Knowledge FoundationEU, Horizon 2020, 646184Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-06-28 Laget: 2019-06-28 Sist oppdatert: 2023-05-26bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Eriksson, JoakimTsiftes, Nicolas

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Eriksson, JoakimTsiftes, Nicolas
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 186 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.46.0