Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Basic In-Mouth Attribute Evaluation: A Comparison of Two Panels.
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Biovetenskap och material, Jordbruk och livsmedel. Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Foods (Basel, Switzerland), ISSN 2304-8158, Vol. 8, nr 1, artikkel-id E3Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Astringency is often difficult to evaluate accurately in wine because of its complexity. This accuracy can improve through training sessions, but it can be time-consuming and expensive. A way to reduce these costs can be the use of wine experts, who are known to be reliable evaluators. Therefore, the aim of this work was to compare the sensory results and the panel performance obtained using trained panelists versus wine experts (winemakers). Judges evaluated twelve red wines for in-mouth basic perception (sweet, sour, bitter, astringent, and burning sensation) following the same tasting protocol and with the samples being presented in two different tasting modalities. Panels' performance and relationship between the chemical composition and the sensory perception were investigated. Both panels showed similar consistency and repeatability, and they were able to accurately measure the astringency of the wines. However, the significant correlations between sensory scores and chemical composition varied with the panel and the tasting modality. From our results, we could see that winemakers tended to discriminate better between the samples when the differences were very small.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2018. Vol. 8, nr 1, artikkel-id E3
Emneord [en]
astringency, comparison, red wine, trained panel, winemakers
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-37508DOI: 10.3390/foods8010003PubMedID: 30577639OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-37508DiVA, id: diva2:1281448
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-01-22 Laget: 2019-01-22 Sist oppdatert: 2019-01-22bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 3 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.35.7