Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Review of life-cycle based methods for absolute environmental sustainability assessment and their applications
CIRAIG, Canada; Concordia University, Canada.
New Zealand Life Cycle Management Centre, New Zealand; Massey University, New Zealand.
CIRAIG, Canada.
Doka Life Cycle Assessments, Switzerland.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Environmental Research Letters, E-ISSN 1748-9326, Vol. 15, no 8, article id 083001Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In many regions and at the planetary scale, human pressures on the environment exceed levels that natural systems can sustain. These pressures are caused by networks of human activities, which often extend across countries and continents due to global trade. This has led to an increasing requirement for methods that enable absolute environmental sustainability assessment (AESA) of anthropogenic systems and which have a basis in life cycle assessment (LCA). Such methods enable the comparison of environmental impacts of products, companies, nations, etc, with an assigned share of environmental carrying capacity for various impact categories. This study is the first systematic review of LCA-based AESA methods and their applications. After developing a framework for LCA-based AESA methods, we identified 45 relevant studies through an initial survey, database searches and citation analysis. We characterized these studies according to their intended application, impact categories, basis of carrying capacity estimates, spatial differentiation of environmental model and principles for assigning carrying capacity. We then characterized all method applications and synthesized their results. Based on this assessment, we present recommendations to practitioners on the selection and use of existing LCA-based AESA methods, as well as ways to perform assessments and communicate results to decision-makers. Furthermore, we identify future research priorities intended to extend coverage of all components of the proposed method framework, improve modeling and increase the applicability of methods. © 2020 The Author(s). 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOP Publishing Ltd , 2020. Vol. 15, no 8, article id 083001
Keywords [en]
absolute environmental sustainability, carrying capacity, case study review, life cycle assessment, planetary boundaries, safe operating space, sharing principle, Decision making, Environmental impact, Life cycle, Search engines, Anthropogenic systems, Environmental carrying capacities, Environmental model, Environmental sustainability, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Research priorities, Spatial differentiation, Systematic Review, Sustainable development, anthropogenic effect, environmental assessment, global trade, human activity, life cycle analysis, spatial variation, sustainability
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-51430DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab89d7Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85092284536OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-51430DiVA, id: diva2:1516322
Available from: 2021-01-11 Created: 2021-01-11 Last updated: 2024-01-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Roos, Sandra

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Roos, Sandra
By organisation
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
In the same journal
Environmental Research Letters
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf