Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Carrier phase estimation methods in coherent transmission systems influenced by equalization enhanced phase noise
RISE, Swedish ICT, Acreo. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden; Tianjin University, China.
RISE, Swedish ICT, Acreo.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.
RISE, Swedish ICT, Acreo.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Optics Communications, ISSN 0030-4018, E-ISSN 1873-0310, Vol. 293, p. 54-60Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We present a comparative study on three carrier phase estimation algorithms, including a one-tap normalized least mean square (NLMS) method, a block-average method, and a Viterbi-Viterbi method in the n-level phase shift keying coherent transmission systems considering the equalization enhanced phase noise (EEPN). In these carrier phase estimation methods, the theoretical bit-error-rate floors based on traditional leading-order Taylor expansion are compared to the practical simulation results, and the tolerable total effective linewidths (involving the transmitter, the local oscillator lasers and the EEPN) for a fixed bit-error-rate floor are evaluated with different block sizes, when the fiber nonlinearities are neglected. The complexity of the three carrier phase estimation methods is also discussed. We find that the carrier phase estimation methods in practical systems should be analyzed based on the simulation results rather than the traditional theoretical predictions, when large EEPN is involved. The one-tap NLMS method can always show an acceptable behavior, while the step size is complicated to optimize. The block-average method is efficient to implement, but it behaves unsatisfactorily when using a large block size. The Viterbi-Viterbi method can show a small improvement compared to the block-average method, while it requires more computational complexity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 293, p. 54-60
Keywords [en]
Carrier phase estimation, Coherent optical transmission system, Equalization enhanced phase noise, Phase shift keying, Block sizes, Coherent transmission, Comparative studies, Fiber nonlinearities, Local oscillators, Normalized least mean square, Optical transmission systems, Practical systems, Step size, Taylor expansions, Theoretical prediction, Floors, Phase noise, Transmissions, Estimation
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-47483DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2012.11.090Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84873406927OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-47483DiVA, id: diva2:1465604
Available from: 2020-09-10 Created: 2020-09-10 Last updated: 2020-12-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus
By organisation
Acreo
In the same journal
Optics Communications
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 183 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf