System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Publications (5 of 5) Show all publications
Arrhenius, K., Francini, L., Fischer, A., Büker, O. & Arques, L. (2023). Comparison of optical feedback cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy and gas chromatography for the measurement of the main components and impurities in biogas, landfill gas, biomethane and carbon dioxide streams. Measurement science and technology, 34(9), Article ID 095011.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Comparison of optical feedback cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy and gas chromatography for the measurement of the main components and impurities in biogas, landfill gas, biomethane and carbon dioxide streams
Show others...
2023 (English)In: Measurement science and technology, ISSN 0957-0233, E-ISSN 1361-6501, Vol. 34, no 9, article id 095011Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this study, we evaluated the performances of a custom-built optical feedback cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy (OFCEAS) instrument for the determination of the composition of energy gases, focusing on methane and carbon dioxide as main components, and carbon monoxide as impurities, in comparison with the well-established, validated, and traceable gas chromatographic method. A total of 115 real sample gases collected in biogas plants or landfills were analyzed using with both techniques over a period of 12 months. The comparison of the techniques showed that the virtual model which allows the measurement, needs to be optimized using real samples of varied compositions. The OFCEAS measurement technique was found to be capable of measuring both the main components and a trace component in different matrices; to within a 2% measurement uncertainty (higher than the gas chromatograph/thermal conductivity detector (GC/TCD) method). The OFCEAS method exhibits a very fast response, does not require daily calibration, and can be implemented online. The agreements between the OFCEAS technique and the GC/TCD method show that the drift of the OFCEAS instruments remains acceptable in the long term as long as no change is made to the virtual model. Matrix effects were observed, and those need to be taken into consideration when analyzing different types of samples. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Physics, 2023
Keywords
biogas, biomethane, OFCEAS, performance assessment, Absorption spectroscopy, Carbon dioxide, Carbon monoxide, Chromatographic analysis, Gas chromatography, Gas plants, Gases, Light absorption, Optical feedback, Uncertainty analysis, Cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy, Feedback cavity, Gas chromatographs, Impurities in, Optical feedback cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy, Real samples, Thermal conductivity detectors, Virtual models
National Category
Chemical Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-65565 (URN)10.1088/1361-6501/acd94a (DOI)2-s2.0-85162116942 (Scopus ID)
Note

Correspondence Address: K. Arrhenius; Research Institutes of Sweden AB (RISE), Frans Perssons väg, Göteborg, 412 76, Sweden. The Joint Research Project «Metrology for decarbonizing the gas grid» is supported the European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR). The EMPIR initiative is co-funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the EMPIR Participating States

Available from: 2023-06-29 Created: 2023-06-29 Last updated: 2024-05-22Bibliographically approved
Arrhenius, K., Fischer, A., Büker, O., Adrien, H., El Masri, A., Lestremau, F. & Robinson, T. (2020). Analytical methods for the determination of oil carryover from CNG/biomethane refueling stations recovered in a solvent. RSC Advances, 10(20), 11907-11917
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Analytical methods for the determination of oil carryover from CNG/biomethane refueling stations recovered in a solvent
Show others...
2020 (English)In: RSC Advances, E-ISSN 2046-2069, Vol. 10, no 20, p. 11907-11917Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Vehicle gas is often compressed to about 200 bar at the refueling station prior to charging to the vehicle's tank. If a high amount of oil is carried over to the gas, it may cause damage to the vehicles; it is therefore necessary to accurately measure oil carryover. In this paper, three analytical methods for accurate quantification of the oil content are presented whereby two methods are based on gas chromatography and one on FTIR. To better evaluate the level of complexity of the matrix, 10 different compressor oils in use at different refueling stations were initially collected and analysed with GC and FTIR to identify their analytical traces. The GC traces could be divided into three different profiles: oils exhibiting some well resolved peaks, oils exhibiting globally unresolved peaks with some dominant peaks on top of the hump and oils exhibiting globally unresolved peaks. After selection of three oils; one oil from each type, the three methods were evaluated with regards to the detection and quantification limits, the working range, precision, trueness and robustness. The evaluation of the three measurement methods demonstrated that any of these three methods presented were suitable for the quantification of compressor oil for samples. The FTIR method and the GC/MS method both resulted in measurement uncertainties close to 20% rel. while the GC/FID method resulted in a higher measurement uncertainty (U = 30% rel.).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Royal Society of Chemistry, 2020
Keywords
Gas chromatography, Vehicles, Accurate quantifications, Analytical method, Compressor oil, Detection and quantification limit, Measurement methods, Measurement uncertainty, Oil contents, Uncertainty analysis
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-44716 (URN)10.1039/d0ra01399d (DOI)2-s2.0-85082745947 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2020-04-27 Created: 2020-04-27 Last updated: 2023-05-23Bibliographically approved
Arrhenius, K., Büker, O., Fischer, A., Persijn, S. & Moore, N. (2020). Development and evaluation of a novel analyser for ISO14687 hydrogen purity analysis. Measurement science and technology, 31(7), Article ID 075010.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Development and evaluation of a novel analyser for ISO14687 hydrogen purity analysis
Show others...
2020 (English)In: Measurement science and technology, ISSN 0957-0233, E-ISSN 1361-6501, Vol. 31, no 7, article id 075010Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Standards ISO14687 and EN17124 set stringent limits for numerous gaseous impurities and particulates that may damage the fuel cell system in a hydrogen vehicle, as it is highly sensitive to the presence of even very low levels of impurities. However, performing the whole set of analyses is both technically challenging and time-consuming for any laboratory and will require a combination of several analytical techniques or instruments. In this study, we discussed the selection of analytical techniques for hydrogen purity testing in order to optimize the CAPEX (capital expenditure) and OPEX (operational expenditure), while ensuring the quality of the results and the compliance of the analytical methods with ISO21087. Among the individual impurities to be analysed in ISO14687, spectroscopy techniques are suitable for ammonia, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, formic acid, oxygen and water. Spectroscopy techniques are even suitable for some impurities belonging to the three total species such as hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen chloride and methane. However, helium and argon, which are monoatomic, do not exhibit response in the infrared region. Therefore, any spectroscopic analysis method must be completed by another method in order to simultaneously analyse all individual gaseous impurities from ISO14687. In this study, we constructed and demonstrated the feasibility of an instrument composed of a gas chromatograph having three columns (two packed columns and a PLOT (Porous Layer Open Tubular) column and two detectors (FID and TCD) coupled in parallel to two OFCEAS instruments using reference gas mixtures. Finally, we also proposed an extended configuration that will allow performing the whole set of analyses for gaseous species from ISO14687

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Physics Publishing, 2020
Keywords
analyser, gas chromatography, hydrogen, hydrogen purity, OFCEAS, Ammonia, Carbon dioxide, Carbon monoxide, Chemical sensors, Chlorine compounds, Fuel cells, Sulfur compounds, Analytical method, Capital expenditures, Gas chromatographs, Gaseous impurities, Hydrogen chloride, Hydrogen vehicles, Infrared regions, Operational expenditures, Spectroscopic analysis
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-45076 (URN)10.1088/1361-6501/ab7cf3 (DOI)2-s2.0-85084981557 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2020-06-25 Created: 2020-06-25 Last updated: 2023-05-23Bibliographically approved
Bacquart, T., Arrhenius, K., Persijn, S., Rojo, A., Auprêtre, F., Gozlan, B., . . . Haloua, F. (2019). Hydrogen fuel quality from two main production processes: Steam methane reforming and proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Journal of Power Sources, 444, Article ID 227170.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Hydrogen fuel quality from two main production processes: Steam methane reforming and proton exchange membrane water electrolysis
Show others...
2019 (English)In: Journal of Power Sources, ISSN 0378-7753, E-ISSN 1873-2755, Vol. 444, article id 227170Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The absence of contaminants in the hydrogen delivered at the hydrogen refuelling station is critical to ensure the length life of FCEV. Hydrogen quality has to be ensured according to the two international standards ISO 14687–2:2012 and ISO/DIS 19880-8. Amount fraction of contaminants from the two hydrogen production processes steam methane reforming and PEM water electrolyser is not clearly documented. Twenty five different hydrogen samples were taken and analysed for all contaminants listed in ISO 14687-2. The first results of hydrogen quality from production processes: PEM water electrolysis with TSA and SMR with PSA are presented. The results on more than 16 different plants or occasions demonstrated that in all cases the 13 compounds listed in ISO 14687 were below the threshold of the international standards. Several contaminated hydrogen samples demonstrated the needs for validated and standardised sampling system and procedure. The results validated the probability of contaminants presence proposed in ISO/DIS 19880-8. It will support the implementation of ISO/DIS 19880-8 and the development of hydrogen quality control monitoring plan. It is recommended to extend the study to other production method (i.e. alkaline electrolysis), the HRS supply chain (i.e. compressor) to support the technology growth.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V., 2019
Keywords
Fuel cell electrical vehicles, Gas analysis, Hydrogen production, Hydrogen quality, ISO14687, Contamination, Electrolysis, Gas fuel analysis, ISO Standards, Methane, Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), Quality control, Steam reforming, Supply chains, Electrical vehicles, Hydrogen fuel qualities, Hydrogen production process, Hydrogen refuelling stations, International standards, Proton exchange membranes
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-40596 (URN)10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227170 (DOI)2-s2.0-85073687836 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2019-11-12 Created: 2019-11-12 Last updated: 2023-05-23Bibliographically approved
Arrhenius, K., Fischer, A. & Büker, O. (2019). Methods for sampling biogas and biomethane on adsorbent tubes after collection in gas bags. Applied Sciences, 9(6), Article ID 1171.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Methods for sampling biogas and biomethane on adsorbent tubes after collection in gas bags
2019 (English)In: Applied Sciences, E-ISSN 2076-3417, Vol. 9, no 6, article id 1171Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Biogas is a renewable energy source with many different production pathways and numerous excellent opportunities for use; for example, as vehicle fuel after upgrading (biomethane). Reliable analytical methodologies for assessing the quality of the gas are critical for ensuring that the gas can be used technically and safely. An essential part of any procedure aimed at determining the quality is the sampling and transfer to the laboratory. Sampling bags and sorbent tubes are widely used for collecting biogas. In this study, we have combined these two methods, i.e., sampling in a gas bag before subsequent sampling onto tubes in order to demonstrate that this alternative can help eliminate the disadvantages associated with the two methods whilst combining their advantages; with expected longer storage stability as well as easier sampling and transport. The results of the study show that two parameters need to be taken into account when transferring gas from a bag on to an adsorbent; the water content of the gas and the flow rate used during transfer of the gas on to the adsorbent. © 2019 by the authors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG, 2019
Keywords
Bags, Biogas, Biomethane, Flow rate, Sampling
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-38460 (URN)10.3390/app9061171 (DOI)2-s2.0-85063743716 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2019-05-06 Created: 2019-05-06 Last updated: 2023-05-23Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-7550-8365

Search in DiVA

Show all publications