Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2024 (English)In: Composites Science And Technology, ISSN 0266-3538, E-ISSN 1879-1050, Vol. 251, article id 110571Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
This study centers on investigating the influence of conductive additives, carbon black (Super P) and graphene, within the context of LiFePO4 (LFP)-impregnated carbon fibers (CFs) produced using the powder impregnation method. The performance of these additives was subject to an electrochemical evaluation. The findings reveal that there are no substantial disparities between the two additives at lower cycling rates, highlighting their adaptability in conventional energy storage scenarios. However, as cycling rates increase, graphene emerges as the better performer. At a rate of 1.5C in a half-cell versus lithium, electrodes containing graphene exhibited a discharge capacity of 83 mAhgLFP−1; those with Super P and without any additional conductive additive showed a capacity of 65 mAhgLFP−1 and 48 mAhgLFP−1, respectively. This distinction is attributed to the structural and conductivity advantages inherent to graphene, showing its potential to enhance the electrochemical performance of structural batteries. Furthermore, LFP-impregnated CFs were evaluated in full cells versus pristine CFs, yielding relatively similar results, though with a slightly improved outcome observed with the graphene additive. These results provide valuable insights into the role of conductive additives in structural batteries and their responsiveness to varying operational conditions, underlining the potential for versatile energy storage solutions. © 2024 The Authors
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd, 2024
Keywords
Additives; Carbon black; Carbon fibers; Electric discharges; Electrodes; Energy storage; Graphene; Iron compounds; Lithium-ion batteries; Battery performance; Carbon additives; Carbon fiber electrodes; Conductive additives; Conductive carbon; Cycling rates; Impregnated carbons; Impregnation methods; LiFePO 4; Structural batteries; Lithium compounds
National Category
Chemical Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-72834 (URN)10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110571 (DOI)2-s2.0-85189511494 (Scopus ID)
Note
The authors also would like to thank the following sources for funding this research: VINNOVA (Sweden's Innovation Agency) through the Competence Centre BASE- Batteries Sweden, the Swedish Research Council [project number 2020\u201305057], Swedish Energy Agency [project number 50508\u20131], Air Force Office of Scientific Research [grant number FA8655-21-1-7039] and STandUP for Energy.
2024-05-142024-05-142024-08-14Bibliographically approved